The peer review process is a cornerstone of ensuring the quality and integrity of the research published in the International Journal of Analysis in Basic and Applied Science (IJABAS). We are committed to maintaining a rigorous, transparent, and fair review process that upholds the standards of scientific excellence.

1. Initial Submission Check

   Upon receiving a manuscript, the editorial team conducts an initial check to ensure that the submission:

   • Falls within the scope of the journal.
   • Adheres to the journal's formatting and submission guidelines.
   • Is free from plagiarism and ethical concerns.

   Submissions that do not meet these criteria are returned to the authors for revision or rejection.

2. Assignment to an Editor

   Manuscripts that pass the initial check are assigned to a member of the editorial board with expertise in the relevant field. The editor evaluates the manuscript and decides whether it should proceed to the peer review stage or be rejected.

3. Selection of Reviewers

   The editor selects two or more independent reviewers who are experts in the subject matter of the manuscript. Reviewers are chosen based on their knowledge, experience, and lack of conflicts of interest with the authors or the research.

4. Reviewers' Responsibilities

   Reviewers are tasked with critically evaluating the manuscript on various aspects, including:

   • Originality: Does the research provide new insights or contribute to the field?
   • Relevance: Is the study relevant to the journal's scope and audience?
   • Methodology: Are the research methods appropriate, robust, and well-documented?
   • Results and Discussion: Are the findings presented clearly and interpreted correctly?
   • Ethical Standards: Has the research been conducted ethically, and are all necessary approvals obtained?

   Reviewers provide constructive feedback, highlighting strengths and identifying areas for improvement. They are also required to recommend one of the following:

   • Accept without revision.
   • Accept with minor revisions.
   • Major revisions required.
   • Reject.

5. Editorial Decision

   Based on the reviewers' reports, the editor makes an editorial decision. If revisions are required, authors are given the opportunity to address the reviewers' comments and resubmit their manuscript.

6. Revision and Final Review

   The revised manuscript undergoes a final review to ensure that all feedback has been adequately addressed. This may involve further rounds of review if necessary.

7. Acceptance and Publication

   Once the manuscript meets the journal's standards, it is accepted for publication. Authors are notified, and the manuscript is prepared for publication in an upcoming issue of IJABAS.

8. Confidentiality and Anonymity

   IJABAS follows a double-blind peer review process, where both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous to each other. This ensures unbiased and impartial reviews.

9. Reviewer Ethics

   Reviewers must adhere to ethical guidelines, including:

   • Maintaining the confidentiality of the manuscript and the review process.
   • Declaring any conflicts of interest.
   • Providing fair, objective, and constructive feedback.